The use of the term 'anti-vaxxer' by so-called experts is a huge tell and red flag for me. They know damn well not everyone who opposes these 'vaccines' are necessarily 'anti-vaxxer'. Doing so commits a logical fallacy.
What are the odds such a dramatic event finds its way to Canada? Sounds like we have some deep-state players in control.
These experimental gene therapies have been all-consuming. The promoters are trying to monopolize the entire landscape--and for obvious reasons: they intend to turn all existing vaccines into mRNA products. So in a way, using "anti-vaxxer" in this manner is just a portent of the future, when many of us will rightly and proudly call ourselves "anti-vaxxers". The term will be surrendered by the offenders, just like "queer" and "gay" were.
The use of the term 'anti-vaxxer' by so-called experts is a huge tell and red flag for me. They know damn well not everyone who opposes these 'vaccines' are necessarily 'anti-vaxxer'. Doing so commits a logical fallacy.
What are the odds such a dramatic event finds its way to Canada? Sounds like we have some deep-state players in control.
These experimental gene therapies have been all-consuming. The promoters are trying to monopolize the entire landscape--and for obvious reasons: they intend to turn all existing vaccines into mRNA products. So in a way, using "anti-vaxxer" in this manner is just a portent of the future, when many of us will rightly and proudly call ourselves "anti-vaxxers". The term will be surrendered by the offenders, just like "queer" and "gay" were.