The Next “Disease X” Means New Modes of Vaccination and Control

The Next One—Part 1

The “anti-vaxxer” of the future

The real threat to societies and human individuals is not “Disease X” as much as “Disaster X”: the human-made “response” to the perception of a potential or imagined pandemic. The Next One will feature a variety of tools, all based on “lessons learned” during 3/11. Many—on whichever side of the Covid debates—wrongly say that “nobody has learned anything”. Instead, it is that all sides have learned what they wanted to learn from 3/11. For some at the top of the power pyramid, that means learning new ways to better crack down.

This page features five videos, each of which offers a small piece of the puzzle of what we should expect for The Next One. Even when they are all taken together, however, the best they offer is an incomplete picture of what Disaster X will look like.

Overcoming Resistance

A 2018 paper published by Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health, outlined new technologies to be developed to address “global catastrophic biological risks”. One of these would be “self-spreading vaccines”:

“Self-spreading vaccines—also known as transmissible or self-propagating vaccines—are genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection”.

From January 31 in 2020 itself, see The Telegraph’s “Could self-spreading vaccines stop a coronavirus pandemic?”. Developers admit that such vaccines will still kill people, but argue that a pandemic would kill more. This is where we have our second new development: gone is the proclamation of “safe and effective”. That phrase, “safe and effective,” proved to become even more problematic for the people speaking it, than those hearing it critically—so the authorities are jettisoning it altogether. The next shots will not be announced as “safe and effective,” but as either “tried and tested” (which says nothing about results), or perhaps in a more authoritarian fashion, “necessary and mandatory”.

We also learn that the US Government is itself invested, via DARPA, in creating these new technologies. In addition, the 2022 PREP Act mandates the use of new platform technologies.

Another new technology would involve delivering vaccines via food. This approach is recognized in Tennessee’s Bill HB1894, where there is concern that food sources may be modified in order to deliver vaccines. Vaccines would thus be put in lettuce, tomatoes, and tobacco, as just a few examples. The problem would be with dosage—how many tomatoes does a person of a particular size need to eat? Will they eat enough, or too much? It does not seem to be a practical solution, unless the only desired outcome is maximum population compliance with mandated vaccination. That approach will not work, however, if the treated foods are clearly marked as pharmaceutical products, which is what TN HB1894 does.

The key social and political points of developing these new vaccine technologies are that they aim to defeat “vaccine hesitancy” and “vaccine resistance” by circumventing refusal. The ethical stance of informed non-consent, plus the emphasis on bodily autonomy, and the assertion of the right to medical privacy and thus non-disclosure of one’s medical status—would all be dissolved and evaporated by these new technologies. Self-spreading vaccines, and inhalable vaccines that can be sprayed through the air, not to mention vaccines in food—all of these are designed to circumvent “behavioural barriers”

Thus the third new development is growing recognition that vaccine mandates failed to achieve their stated objectives. Vaccine mandates were politically costly, and virtually no government which imposed them has survived the very next election that followed. Such mandates resulted in massive resentment, civil disobedience, growing distrust in government and medical institutions, and declining vaccination rates across the board. Vaccine mandates will not be a feature of Disaster X, because they will be rendered redundant by the technology itself.

Another development involves self-amplifying mRNA vaccines, which theoretically eliminate the need for boosters and have been readied for a range of infectious diseases. The FDA has already approved clinical trials.

With recognition that the use of self-spreading and inhalable vaccines will indeed kill, authorities need to contain the political fallout resulting from people recognizing that some of those around them are dropping dead. Thus another key technology that is being perfected is that of censorship—and it is being perfected in legal and customary senses. Censorship will no longer be on an ad hoc basis, exercised by individual platforms in their own ways, at their own pace. It will instead be instituted nationally, and implemented automatically, as a legal requirement. It will also be refined and targeted censorship, which will result from criminalizing a specific type of dissent as long as it can be construed by the authorities as being a form of “pressure” or “manipulation” that “encourages” persons to avoid certain treatments, including prophylactic treatments such as vaccines. France has passed a new law to do just that. That is the de jure approach. Quebec has a de facto approach, as evidenced by Laval University and its firing of my colleague, Dr. Patrick Provost, an expert on RNA who dared to criticize the use of mRNA shots for children.

What states and corporate partners are doing is working on a total, final solution to the “vax resistance” and “informed consent” problem. One is to put vaccines in food. The other is to create inhalable, self-spreading vaccines. To prevent the public from being informed, criminalize dissent and critique in advance—thus take the censorship we saw/see, and elevate it to a higher level. Thus they solve another problem, that of vaccine mandates.

Hollywood Directives for Disaster X

By far the most dreaded plague of them all, as featured in movies from Hollywood and Hollywood’s international offshoots, is the Bird Flu (aka Avian Influenza, or H5N1). The most extreme measures, the deadliest state responses in Hollywood films appear whenever Bird Flu is involved. It was thus interesting to hear Alex Jones (below) say that for Disease X “Hollywood directives” will be invoked, and he then speaks of Bird Flu. For over two years now, in Telegram, I have been working on a serialized draft of what I call “The Hollywood Files,” which focuses on how for over seven decades Hollywood has imagined/imaged pandemics. I am barely half-way through and the series has been interrupted for over six months.

Alex Jones in the video at the bottom speaks about Disease X, about which the UN has been speaking for several years. The chief candidate for the deadliest Disease X is in fact Bird Flu, with suggestions that it has 38.3% mortality. Bird Flu has already achieved airborne transmission—the next and final remaining step is sustained and widespread human-to-human transmission (see the next article to come after this one). The rest of the video is the usual overwrought alarmism that is Jones’ signature. However, for me, the best and most memorable phrase in that presentation is when he speaks of “Hollywood directives” shaping the response. This video was recorded before the tepid and unimaginative “Event 201” exercise, which at best was a pale rendition of what Hollywood had already simulated many times before.

Jones, however, is wrong in the sense that some of the measures have not yet been envisioned by Hollywood.

The use of self-spreading and inhalable vaccines, for example, will by itself nullify the need to use any of the following measures:

• vaccination clinics

• vaccine mandates

• vaccine passports

• administration of exemptions

• lockdowns

• quarantines and other isolation measures

• fines for non-compliance

• social distancing

• masks

Masks will specifically be prohibited. Masking will flip from being a symbol of conformity, to becoming a necessity for those resisting what will in effect be forced, mass vaccination.

Where the use of inhalable vaccines might follow Hollywood directives—or perhaps Vietnam directives—is if governments deploy their air forces or even just commandeer crop dusters to fly over populated areas to spray them from above.

Imagining Tomorrow’s “Anti-Vaxxer”

With the advent of inhalable, self-spreading vaccines, the “anti-vaxxers” of the near future will be easy to spot in public—see the banner image at the top of this page. They are the ones who will be visibly singled out for donning the very same type of attire that they mocked, denounced, and rejected during 3/11. People will now point at them, and shame them. The new generation of “anti-vaxxers” will demand that groceries be left outside on the doorstep, before bringing them in and wiping them down thoroughly. They will never go to cafes, restaurants, bars, gyms, or movie theatres. Travel will be out of the question. They will lobby to work from home. Or they might opt for total isolation and separation from the rest of society, perhaps living in communities in remote, inaccessible areas.

While mandates, fines, lockdowns, and so forth will be solved by inhalable, self-spreading vaccines, one problem will not be: determined, informed, pre-emptive non-compliance. That is to say, people who come to Disaster X all suited up to resist self-spreading and inhalable vaccines. In this case one Hollywood directive will still be “useful”: detention camps. The other measure would be having police rip the masks off the faces of resisters and forcing them to breathe the vax-contaminated air.

Another Hollywood directive that might be used would be where a highly lethal pathogen defeats any vaccination efforts. Then we might expect mass aerial bombardments of contaminated zones.

Disaster X is Not a Matter of “If”

That “the next one” will in fact happen is no longer a matter of if, but simply when. Too much is riding on another pandemic to be able to avoid it as a useful, profitable short-term solution. It’s like guaranteed lottery earnings for someone deep in debt: you have to cheat to win, but the prize is too big to resist, and you are almost forced to cheat.

We need to understand that we are living through two coinciding turning points: one concerns limits on economic growth, which threaten the corporate-capitalist order; the other is growing instability and difficulty in governing. What unites both capitalists and the state is extreme distaste for disorder and unpredictability (except in instances where those too can be capitalized).

On the corporate-capitalist front, the challenge is to find new frontiers of economic growth. These new horizons have already been found, but remain to be mined more fully: not just new space ventures (almost too archaic to be included here), but automation of the human body; AI; robotics; manipulation of human cells; electronic interfaces with the brain; genetic therapies; and, climate control. Big Pharma along with Big Tech stands to gain the most, and together than have daunting influence that is unprecedented. Also, the two are directly represented within the new Trump regime.

On the state front, the challenge is to find new modes of ensuring conformity and compliance, while making trust in authority almost mandatory—or render survival almost impossible without such trust. Without control over information, states which already offer citizens painfully few rewards for citizenship, risk collapsing into a state of anarchy.

So the motivations for a new pandemic are absolutely monumental.

Finding solutions or developing effective responses that require collective action will be elusive. The so-called “health freedom movement” in North America, for example, is beyond being just fractured and divided—it basically does not exist. Expect very little collective resistance at all. “Raising awareness” will be largely pointless. One thing about Disaster X is that it will render all of the relentless, interminable podcasting and sales of supplements completely redundant—one can almost be thankful for that. Legal injunctions against further development or deployment of self-spreading and inhalable vaccines might be the best option, but none of the NGOs that engage in lawfare are even mentioning this. Learning to live in total isolation, in what might effectively be a “bubble,” might turn out to be the best option for avoiding both the pathogen and the deadly response—but for most of humanity it is not a practical solution.

The Videos:

On self-spreading vaccines:

On vaccines delivered through the food supply:

On vaccine mandates being a failure:

On the criminalization of medical resistance:

Alex Jones on “Disease X”: Bird Flu

---